You Won't Believe These Suez Canal Conspiracies
3 years ago
Following issues and politics in St. Louis area from the retired "Steelworker" view. Politics will be the main theme, but news of the group and Steelworkers will also be followed.
[Flemming v. Davis, 363 U.S. 603, 609 (1960)] 3. Furthermore, payments made by employers for each of their employees are NOT matching to be credited to the account of the employee, but constitute an EXCISE TAX on the employer's right to do business. Consequently, his so-called "contributions" go directly into the general fund of the treasury. 4. People participating in Social Security payroll deductions do NOT acquire property rights or contractual rights through their payments, as they would if they were paying on an insurance policy or contributing to an annuity plan. Simply put, there are no guarantees! The Congress does have power to deny benefits to citizens even, though they had paid S.S. taxes. Also, the amounts of benefits granted are at the option of Congress. Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 610 (1960). 5. Benefits granted under Social Security are therefore NOT considered earned by the worker, but simply constitute a gratuity or gesture of charity. As the Court states: "Congress included in the original Act, and has since retained a claim expressly reserving to it the right to alter, amend, or repeal any provision of the Act". [Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 610-11 (1960)]
Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||
Argued January 26–29, 1886 Decided May 10, 1886 | ||||||
Full case name | Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company | |||||
Citations | 118 U.S. 394 (more) 6 S. Ct. 1132, 30 L. Ed. 118 | |||||
Prior history | Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of California | |||||
Holding | ||||||
The railroad corporations are persons with the intent of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. | ||||||
Court membership | ||||||
| ||||||
Case opinions | ||||||
Majority | Harlan, joined by unanimous court | |||||
Laws applied | ||||||
14 Stat. 292, §§ 1, 2, 3, 11, 18 (an Act of 1866 giving special privileges to the Atlantic and Pacific Railway Corporation) |
But what’s interesting about Sankaty Credit Opportunities is that, according to his 2012 financial disclosure, Romney’s interest in the entity was part of his retirement package: It was made “pursuant to an agreement with Bain Capital regarding Mr. Romney’s retirement” in 1999. But according to its audited financial statement, Sankaty Credit Opportunities didn’t exist yet when Romney retired: “Sankaty Credit Opportunities, L.P., is a Delaware limited partnership which commenced operations on August 12, 2002.” In other words, Romney’s 1999 retirement agreement included an investment in an entity created in 2002—in fact, was created in the heat of his first gubernatorial campaign in Massachusetts. When Romney explained at an October 29, 2002, debate in Massachusetts that he wasn’t responsible for Bain’s actions after his 1999 retirement, it was just 8 weeks after the creation by Bain of a fund that was part of his retirement agreement.
Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy