Sunday, December 29, 2013

An end-of-year message from Robert Reich

Climate change by the numbers: The worst is yet to come

Climate change by the numbers: The worst is yet to come

click

snip

“We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations,” President Obama announced back in January at his second-term inauguration. Thus began another year of steady climate change, continued pollution of the atmosphere and half-hearted attempts at changing the world’s dire trajectory.

By many measures, 2013 wasn’t particularly extreme: it it wasn’t the hottest we’ve ever seen; its storms, by and large, weren’t the most devastating. Much of what occurred can best be seen as a sign of things to come. Droughts, believed to be exacerbated by climate change, will become more widespread. Wildfires are expected to get bigger, longer and smokier by 2050. Twelve months, after all, is but a short moment in Earth’s history. Only in the future, looking back, will we be able to recognize the true significance of many of this year’s big numbers:

7: Where 2013 ranks among the warmest years in history, according to the World Meteorological Association. Tied with 2003, the ranking is based on the year’s first nine months, during which average temperatures were 0.86°F above the 1960-1991 global average.

If memory swerves: The 1 percent laughs last, as Wall Street wins again

If memory swerves: The 1 percent laughs last, as Wall Street wins again

click

snip

Later that day, in a climate of almost complete panic, Merrill Lynch — the nation’s third-largest investment bank, which had fed at the same trough — managed to find shelter in the arms of Bank of America. By the next day, the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department announced that they were saving AIG, the mammoth insurance company that had transformed itself into a stealth hedge fund. As for actual hedge funds, more than 700 of them collapsed in the subsequent four months. And Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, the last two investment-banking leviathans, desperately registered themselves as “bank holding companies” and threw themselves upon the mercy of the all-forgiving Fed.

It was the unavoidable explosion after decades of deregulation and willful blindness. A kind of waste product had been deliberately moved through the bowels of a hundred shady mortgage outfits. It was then gilded by delusional ratings agencies and sold to the world by the most respected names in finance. Bribery and deceit and crazy incentives had been the laxatives that pushed this product down the pipe; money and bonhomie and reassuring economic theory had been the sedatives that put the regulators to sleep.

The industry would supervise itself, we were told — and we believed it. Instead our economic order turned out to be wobbly, even rotten. The great banks looked insolvent. The great capitalists looked like criminals.

Do-Nothing Congress Even Better At Doing Nothing Than Last Year

Friday, December 27, 2013

Coast Guard wants barges to ship fracking water : Stltoday

Coast Guard wants barges to ship fracking water : Stltoday

click link

snip

"We expect that shale gas wastewater can be transported just as safely," said Jennifer Carpenter, of American Waterways Operators, a trade group based in Washington, D.C.

Environment America, a federation of 29 state-based groups, strongly disagrees. The group said in a statement that it gathered 29,000 comments opposed to the proposal from people around the country. Courtney Abrams, the clean water program director for the group, urged the Coast Guard to "reject this outrageous proposal."

Extracting natural gas trapped in shale formations requires pumping hundreds of thousands of gallons of water, sand and chemicals into the ground to break apart rock and free the gas. Some of that water, along with large quantities of existing underground water, returns to the surface, and it can contain high levels of salt, drilling chemicals, heavy metals and naturally occurring low-level radiation.

The Marcellus Shale formation, underlying large parts of Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio and some neighboring states, is the nation's most productive natural gas field. Thousands of new wells have been drilled there since 2008, and hundreds of millions of gallons of wastewater needs to be disposed of each year.

Some states, such as Texas and Ohio, have many underground waste disposal wells. But Pennsylvania has only a few, meaning the leftovers have to be shipped elsewhere.

'Senator From Walmart' Hired By Monsanto, Scores Big In Post-Senate Life

old one. note: uswa opposed her in primary. good to see she is doing well.

Wall Street Psychopaths

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

Retired Steelworkers honor Jane Becker with scholarship fund | The Labor Tribune

Retired Steelworkers honor Jane Becker with scholarship fund | The Labor Tribune:

click link

snip

Retired Steelworkers honor Jane Becker with scholarship fund

DECEMBER 23, 2013 by ADMIN in LABOR NEWS FROM OUR REGION with 0 COMMENTS
GIVING BACK: Retired Steelworker Virginia Ohlen (left) returns her drawing winnings to the SOAR scholarship fund, to the delight of Chapter President Jeff Rains and Recording Secretary Dorothy Asbury. – Labor Tribune photo
GIVING BACK: Retired Steelworker Virginia Ohlen (left) returns her drawing winnings to the SOAR scholarship fund, to the delight of Chapter President Jeff Rains and Recording Secretary Dorothy Asbury.
– Labor Tribune photo
By CARL GREEN
Illinois Correspondent
Pontoon Beach IL – It was a time of great pride for Metro East Steelworkers when one of their own, George Becker, was elected the union’s international president in 1993.
Becker served through 2001, and he remains highly regarded for leading the union through mergers, reorganization, tough bargaining and safety improvements, years after his death in 2007.
But people here have also been proud of the efforts of his wife, Jane Becker, who died on July 19, 2013. She was an organizer and mentor for union and political workers, was active with charities, and played a vital role in helping to found Steelworkers Organization of Active Retirees (SOAR), the national retirees group.
GEORGE BECKER
GEORGE
BECKER
So at its well-attended Christmas luncheon on Dec. 9 at the Venice Social Club in Pontoon Beach, the Retirees’ Local Chapter 7-34-2 honored Jane Becker by naming its scholarship program for her, just when the program is in an expansion mode.
The group’s scholarship chairman, Norma Gaines, said she thinks of Jane Becker whenever the group gets together each month.
“A lot of the people remember her efforts to form SOAR,” Gaines said. “It was an idea that was a long time in coming.” 
Having the group has been important to members, she said. “Everybody still likes to see each other. It’s a great thing.”
One retired Steelworker, Bob Means, stood up at the luncheon to recall Jane Becker’s kindness when Means and his wife moved to Pittsburgh in 1984 to work for the international union staff.
JANE BECKER
JANE
BECKER
“We didn’t know anyone there or what to do,” Means recalled. “Jane took us under her wing a

How the U.S. Government Can Follow Its Own Advice to Be a Responsible Consumer - Labor is Not a Commodity

How the U.S. Government Can Follow Its Own Advice to Be a Responsible Consumer - Labor is Not a Commodity

click link




How the U.S. Government Can Follow Its Own Advice to Be a Responsible Consumer

By Bjorn Skorpen Claeson, International Labor Rights Forum
Today, the New York Times reports child labor, blocked fire exits, unsafe buildings, forced overtime and a range of other illegal, unsafe, and abusive conditions for garment workers in factories in Bangladesh, Cambodia, Haiti, Mexico, and Thailand.  These factories have at least one thing in common: the United States government is a customer.   That means these abuses take place with the support of our tax dollars and are carried out in our names.  It also means the Obama administration “flouts its own advice” to private sector companies to use their purchasing power to improve working conditions in overseas garment factories.
Because the U.S. government is the world’s single largest buyer it could create a significant push for safe and decent working conditions in supplier factories across the globe by practicing what it preaches.  How would it do that?
- See more at: http://laborrightsblog.typepad.com/international_labor_right/2013/12/how-the-us-government-can-follow-its-own-advice-to-be-a-responsible-consumer.html#sthash.0sdkvVkR.dpuf


How the U.S. Government Can Follow Its Own Advice to Be a Responsible Consumer

By Bjorn Skorpen Claeson, International Labor Rights Forum
Today, the New York Times reports child labor, blocked fire exits, unsafe buildings, forced overtime and a range of other illegal, unsafe, and abusive conditions for garment workers in factories in Bangladesh, Cambodia, Haiti, Mexico, and Thailand.  These factories have at least one thing in common: the United States government is a customer.   That means these abuses take place with the support of our tax dollars and are carried out in our names.  It also means the Obama administration “flouts its own advice” to private sector companies to use their purchasing power to improve working conditions in overseas garment factories.
Because the U.S. government is the world’s single largest buyer it could create a significant push for safe and decent working conditions in supplier factories across the globe by practicing what it preaches.  How would it do that?
- See more at: http://laborrightsblog.typepad.com/international_labor_right/2013/12/how-the-us-government-can-follow-its-own-advice-to-be-a-responsible-consumer.html#sthash.0sdkvVkR.dpuf

How the U.S. Government Can Follow Its Own Advice to Be a Responsible Consumer

By Bjorn Skorpen Claeson, International Labor Rights Forum
Today, the New York Times reports child labor, blocked fire exits, unsafe buildings, forced overtime and a range of other illegal, unsafe, and abusive conditions for garment workers in factories in Bangladesh, Cambodia, Haiti, Mexico, and Thailand.  These factories have at least one thing in common: the United States government is a customer.   That means these abuses take place with the support of our tax dollars and are carried out in our names.  It also means the Obama administration “flouts its own advice” to private sector companies to use their purchasing power to improve working conditions in overseas garment factories.
Because the U.S. government is the world’s single largest buyer it could create a significant push for safe and decent working conditions in supplier factories across the globe by practicing what it preaches.  How would it do that?
- See more at: http://laborrightsblog.typepad.com/international_labor_right/2013/12/how-the-us-government-can-follow-its-own-advice-to-be-a-responsible-consumer.html#sthash.0sdkvVkR.dpuf

Spying Claus: Season's Greetings from Truthdig!

I'm an Internet Company, I'm the Government

A Message from the Health Insurers of America

Unemployed Screwed By Politicians - The Storm Is Coming!

Saturday, December 21, 2013

Obamacare gains steam

Obamacare gains steam

click link

snip

A total of more than 1 million people have enrolled since Oct. 1, Obama said at his end-of-the-year press conference. That’s a jump from Nov. 30 when just 365,000 had signed up for private insurance in the new federal and state markets offering subsidized coverage.

“That is a big deal,” Obama said of getting coverage for uninsured people. “That’s why I ran for this office.”
Separately, officials said 3.9 million people have qualified for government health care through the law’s Medicaid expansion. Even so, it’s too early to say that the health care rollout has turned the corner.

HealthCare.gov was down for part of the day Friday, as technicians attempted to fix an error that occurred Thursday night when the site was undergoing routine maintenance, officials explained.

Shocking new trend: Conservative economists who don’t want to gut Social Security

Shocking new trend: Conservative economists who <em>don’t</em> want to gut Social Security

click link

snip


Instead, a fairly serious discussion ensued. Well-respected economists on both sides of the aisle agreed it would not be hard or costly to shore up benefits for the poor by as much as 10 or 15 percent, which would markedly improve their quality of life. While no specific commitment was made on where this discussion would go next, it was a sign that the entitlement reform debate is moving beyond just cuts and austerity.

“I have argued for a more far-reaching reform, similar to what you have in New Zealand or the U.K., where every retiree receives a flat benefit at the poverty level. The idea is that you take poverty among [America’s] seniors, which today is at 9 percent, down to zero percent,” said Andrew G. Biggs, an American Enterprise Institute scholar who was the head of Social Security research in the George W. Bush administration.
“On top of that, if you want to have a benefit above poverty, we need to sign people up for employer-sponsored plans or IRAs or something along those lines,” Biggs continued. “Social Security—I’m not going to say that it does not cut poverty. Clearly it does.”

Some of Biggs’ other ideas did not sit well with progressive economists, such as saying that benefits for middle-income earners were more than sufficient and could be cut, as well as suggesting it was a bad idea to raise taxes on wealthier Americans to better fund Social Security. But after years of threatened cuts to entitlements by the GOP and championed by Wall Street titans who want to avoid higher taxes, a serious discussion about updating the safety net was seen as a striking development.

CNN Brings On Tea Party Activist To Undermine NSA Ruling

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

These 7 corporate rip-offs will make you want to scream

These 7 corporate rip-offs will make you want to scream

click link

snip

1. Corporations Profit from Food Stamps
It’s odd to think about billion-dollar financial institutions objecting to cuts in the SNAP program, but some of them are administrators of the program, collecting fees from a benefit meant for  children and other needy Americans, and enjoying subsidies of state tax money for services that could be performed by the states themselves. They want  more people on food stamps, not less. Three corporations have  cornered the market: JP Morgan, Xerox, and eFunds Corp.
According to a JP Morgan  spokesman, the food stamp program “is a very important business to JP Morgan. It’s an important business in terms of its size and scale…The good news from JP Morgan’s perspective is the infrastructure that we built has been able to cope with that increase in volume..”

2. Crash the Economy, Get Your Money Back. Die with a Student Loan, Stay in Debt.
The financial industry has  manipulated the bankruptcy laws to ensure that high-risk derivatives, which devastated the market in 2008, have  FIRST CLAIM over savings deposit insurance, pension funds, and everything else.

News Coverage: The Republican Gift Of Taking Away Unemployment Insurance...

Sunday, December 15, 2013

Take that, Paul Ryan! Elizabeth Warren beats back Social Security plot

Take that, Paul Ryan! Elizabeth Warren beats back Social Security plot

click link

snip

The Overton Window has shifted! At least in the case of Social Security.

The Overton Window — named for the late Joseph P. Overton of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy — is the frame through which acceptable options for public policy are viewed at any given time. Options that are outside of the frame (or “outside the box,” to use another metaphor) are deemed unworthy of consideration or mention by the bipartisan establishment, no matter how compelling those options may actually be. The Overton Window tends to be positioned by the owners and bureaucrats of the major media, who tend to share an elite consensus with politicians and the donors who fund them.

Until recently, in discussions of the future of Social Security the Overton Window was positioned to exclude any discussion of raising, rather than cutting, Social Security benefits. For the last generation, the range of permissible opinion with respect to the program — which most Americans depend on for nearly all of their income in old age — ranged from conservatives who wanted to abolish Social Security altogether, to press-anointed “progressives” and token Democrats who merely wanted to cut Social Security benefits. The option of maintaining scheduled Social Security benefits, and paying for them with higher taxes, was considered unworthy of discussion by the guardians of Overton Orthodoxy, both in the press and in the two major parties. As for expanding Social Security benefits — why, that’s crazy talk!

It’s safe to say that, within the bipartisan oligarchy, the alleged need to cut Social Security remains the consensus. But the Overton Window has shifted just a little to the left, and the idea of expanding Social Security, hitherto invisible through the frame, is now in the public field of vision.

Saturday, December 14, 2013

Tea Party congressman warns Salon: Another shutdown may be coming!

Tea Party congressman warns Salon: Another shutdown may be coming!

click link

snip


By a 332-to-94 vote Thursday night, the House passed a budget deal that – despite taking money from federal workers’ pockets and leaving long-term unemployed in the lurch – was staunchly opposed by major right-wing groups. Among the critics was Tea Party stalwart and Kansas congressman Tim Huelskamp, whom Boehner kicked off the Budget Committee in an alleged purge last year. In an interview before the vote, Huelskamp charged that the deal “doesn’t avoid a government shutdown,” told Salon he hears rumors Boehner’s retiring, and skewered Paul Ryan’s response to right-wing attacks on the deal he brokered. A condensed version of our conversation follows.

Congressman Ryan described this as an agreement that “does not raise taxes, that does reduce the deficit and produces some certainty and prevents a government shutdown.” Why do you disagree with his assessment?

Thursday, December 12, 2013

Bipartisan Budget Deal Leaves GOP Complaining But...

Hidden disaster in new budget: Demonic plot to raid pensions

Hidden disaster in new budget: Demonic plot to raid pensions

click link

snip


2013 has not been a pleasant year if you work for the federal government. You’ve been subject to pay freezes, furloughs and shutdowns. One of you got yelled at by a Tea Party Republican at the World War II memorial. And if Congress passes the budget deal announced Tuesday night by Rep. Paul Ryan and Sen. Patty Murray – a big if – you will get a final Christmas present: You’ll have to pay more into your pension, an effective wage cut that just adds to the $114 billion, with a “B,” federal employees have already given back to the government in the name of deficit reduction.

The deal between House and Senate negotiators Ryan and Murray would reverse part of sequestration for 2014 and 2015, itself a major source of pain for federal workers. But negotiators want to pay for that relief in future years, with the overall package cutting the deficit by an additional $23 billion. And one of the major “pay-fors” is an increase in federal employee pension contributions. President Obama’s 2014 budget included such a proposal, which would have raised the employee contribution in three stages, from 0.8 percent of salary to 2 percent. Congress had already made this shift for new hires; the Obama proposal would affect all workers hired before 2012.

That proposed increased contribution translated to a 1.2 percent pay cut, and a total of around $20 billion in givebacks over 10 years. Negotiators were pressured by the powerful Maryland Democratic delegation, including Minority Leader Steny Hoyer, House Budget Committee ranking member Chris Van Hollen and Senate Appropriations Committee chairwoman Barbara Mikulski, into softening the blow on federal employees, many of whom live in their districts. According to Sen. Murray, the increase in contributions now equals about $6 billion over 10 years. But negotiators traded some of the cuts to federal employee pensions with different cuts to military pensions, also totaling $6 billion. So whatever the occupation, people who work for the government will bear the brunt of the pain.

Oil is now flowing through the southern leg of Keystone XL

Oil is now flowing through the southern leg of Keystone XL

click link

snip


The oil company obviously couldn’t help rubbing its 2.3 billion dollar baby’s success in the face of the protestors and activists who are fighting to keep the Keystone project from going forward. Objections range from the contention that the last thing a warming Earth needs is more fossil fuels to specific concerns about the southern leg of the pipeline’s shoddy construction.

The most controversial part of the project, though, remains in limbo: TransCanada can’t construct the border-crossing northern leg of the pipeline, which will tap directly into Canada’s oil sands, without U.S. approval. Its ultimate victory, as before, hinges on whether or not President Obama decides to take a stand for clean energy.

Tuesday, December 3, 2013

BP wins appeal to limit Gulf spill payouts

BP wins appeal to limit Gulf spill payouts

click link

snip

The appeals court’s order yesterday “again underscores that the implementation” of the settlement “has veered off course,” Geoff Morrell, BP’s spokesman, said in an e-mail. “If properly implemented by the district court, the Fifth Circuit’s order will help return the settlement to its original, intended and lawful function –- the compensation of claimants who sustained actual losses that are traceable to the Deepwater Horizon accident.”

Morrell said the appellate order further supports BP’s contention that “continued violation of the settlement agreement’s clear terms” creates legal problems that “threaten to invalidate the entire settlement unless corrected.”

Lawyers for spill victims have claimed in court filings that BP is trying to renegotiate a deal that is proving more costly than it intended. They contend BP is suffering from “buyer’s remorse.”

Bernie Sanders For President Rumors

Sunday, December 1, 2013

Sorry, neoliberals: Inequality is driven by greed, not technology

Sorry, neoliberals: Inequality is driven by greed, not technology

click link

snip

His argument echoes the conventional wisdom in economics, formulated by Lawrence Katz and Claudia Goldin, that skill-biased technological change can explain most of the increase in inequality. The premise is that technological developments have favored college-educated workers over unskilled labor, thereby increasing inequality. Since it was formulated, SBTC has drawn criticism. A 2002 paper by David Card first drew attention to potential holes in the explanation: a short period of stabilization in wage inequality in the 1990s during a technological boom and the failure to explain wage gaps between men and women as well as blacks and whites. A 2012 paper by Daron Acemoglu and David Autor noted other failures in the theory, namely that it could not explain the divergence in incomes that had occurred among skilled workers and why the real median wages could decline during a period of increasing productivity.

Now, Lawrence Mishel, Heidi Shierholz and John Schmitt have released a new study that questions SBTC as an explanation for increasing wage inequality. Mishel et al. argue that “job polarization,” the premise that more jobs have been created in low-wage sectors and high-wage sectors, thus driving wage inequality, doesn’t actually explain the problem. On the one hand, high-wage occupations have not significantly expanded their share of the workforce since 2000. On the other, low-wage jobs have not increased as a total share of employment since 1979.