Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Politico Who to watch in debate over healthcare

Morning.

Look for a lot of politics to be played while healthcare debate rages. This is an interesting article dealing with folks relatively unknown to most folks. The players listed in the politico article are some of the folks behind the scenes.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Who to watch for in debate over careBy: Carrie Budoff Brown May 3, 2009 10:30 PM EST
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0409/21952_Page2.html

One of the most feared figures in the health care reform debate isn’t an Old Bull committee chairman or a hard-nosed White House chief of staff. He’s a bespectacled, former academic from the Brookings Institution. Doug Elmendorf is now director of the Congressional Budget Office, where he’s charged with pricing the various reform proposals. Nothing moves without being “scored” by his office, and an unfavorable assessment of a program’s cost can be tantamount to defeat. He’s one of five people you may have never heard of who could affect the course of health care reform.

The Scorekeeper: Doug Elmendorf Consider the CBO director as the Oz and the umpire of health care lawmaking. Elmendorf and his team of anonymous analysts will issue the authoritative, nonpartisan, independent price tags on the programs. What they say often goes. The Clinton administration learned that the hard way. In 1994, as it tried to move a massive overhaul through Congress, then-CBO chief Robert Reischauer delivered repeated blows to the plan by questioning its cost estimates. It went down in flames. The measure of Elmendorf’s clout was apparent during a February hearing when Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) seemed to both court and curse him and his band of CBO bean counters.

“We hope this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship,” the chairman said sweetly at one point. Only to add later: “In my judgment, you’re not God. You might be Moses, but not God.” Elmendorf tried to demur. CBO simply provides technical direction, he said, “but as you understand, the hard decisions will be yours.” To which Baucus shot back: “No. That’s incorrect. The hard decisions will be ours, both of us, you and me.” The Organizer: Dennis Rivera Rivera runs a war room that’s now the epicenter of the left-wing mobilization in support of the reform legislation. From the ground floor of the Service Employees International Union headquarters in Washington, Rivera is preparing for the moment a bill drops. At that point, he must make sure the right members of Congress are contacted, the right message is delivered, and his shaky coalition of industry, labor and consumers stays intact. “We are running a political campaign, and our candidate is basically health care reform,” said Rivera, head of SEIU Health Care. Rivera and his team have been laying the groundwork for months, with a war room staff of more than 50 and more than 400 organizers in the field. They have developed profiles on more than 100 members of Congress, collecting mounds of data on voting records, district demographics and health statistics — and influential allies — “people closest to them who could, at some point, talk to them and be more persuasive than us,” Rivera said, citing clergy, former staff members and business leaders. With a reputation for getting the job done, Rivera helped SEIU become the most aggressive and ubiquitous player in the health care debate, forging unorthodox partnerships if that’s what’s required to win. The union has forged marriages of necessity with pharmaceuticals, insurers and hospitals. Rivera talks to his new allies several times a week, if not every day, and will play a key role in deciding how closely they all move forward together. The Backroom Operator: Liz Fowler If you drew an organizational chart of major players in the Senate health care negotiations, Fowler would be the chief operating officer. As a senior aide to Baucus, she directs the Finance Committee health care staff, enforces deadlines on drafting bill language and coordinates with the White House and other lawmakers. She also troubleshoots, identifying policy and political problems before they ripen. “My job is to get from point A to point B,” said Fowler, who’s training for four triathlons this summer in between her long days on Capitol Hill.

Fowler learned as a sophomore at the University of Pennsylvania that the United States was the only industrialized country without universal health care, and she decided then to dedicate her professional life to the work. She first worked for Baucus from 2001 through 2005, playing a key role in negotiating the Medicare Part D prescription drug program. Feeling burned out, she left for the private sector but rejoined Baucus in 2008, sensing that a Democratic-controlled Congress would make progress on overhauling the health care system. Baucus and Fowler spent a year putting the senator in a position to pursue reform, including holding hearings last summer and issuing a white paper in November. They deliberately avoided releasing legislation in order to send a signal of openness and avoid early attacks. “People know when Liz is speaking, she is speaking for Baucus,” said Dean Rosen, the health policy adviser to former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.). The Money Cop: Earl Devaney A former Secret Service agent, Devaney has very little to do with health care reform — directly, at least. But as the guy tasked with minimizing fraud and waste in the $787 billion economic stimulus legislation, one of the single largest government expenditures in American history, Devaney is poised to influence the debate. Here’s why: President Barack Obama and Democrats are proposing a health care fix that could exceed $1 trillion over 10 years — perhaps more, according to some estimates. If Devaney finds egregious examples of wasteful spending on the stimulus front, his work could prove damaging to the president politically and may very well sour the public appetite for a government-heavy approach to health care. It’s a bleed-over effect that has already been on display. When the AIG bonuses erupted into a firestorm in mid-March, health care insiders viewed the development ominously. Obama’s approval ratings dipped to the lowest point of his presidency, and the public was outraged at the way the company, the administration and Congress bungled it. The Storyteller: Jane Doe Health care is about to enter the heart-tugging phase. Groups on the right and left have been quietly building arsenals of narrators — people who can sear the American conscience with personal stories. The American Cancer Society collects cases through a call center in Texas. The SEIU gathers stories by congressional district. And Conservatives for Patients’ Rights, an organization poised to oppose the Obama plan, sent a former CNN reporter to Britain and Canada to produce a documentary on outrages in the European system that critics claim the White House plan will mimic. The last major health care reform effort in the 1990s was defined by Harry and Louise, the fictional middle-class couple featured in an insurance industry ad. And an extraordinarily complex bill went down amid a flurry of 30-second ads. Given the fragmented media environment, a singular TV ad may not hold as much sway as it did in the early ’90s. But that doesn’t mean either side plans to pass up the tool. Conservatives for Patients’ Rights was the first to use it, releasing a 60-second spot featuring Dr. Brian Day, a past president of the Canadian Medical Association, describing how patients in the country are “languishing and suffering on waiting lists.” Expect to see Day lobbying members of Congress — and many more stories from both sides in the weeks to come.
© 2009 Capitol News Company, LL

--------------------------------------------
Note: SEIU, Service Employees Internation Union, is a big supporter of Obama's plan. Although Howard Dean is saying Obama's plan is a single payer, it is not and definately not HR676 sytle healthcare.

SEIU represents a tremendous number of healthcare workers. SEIU United Healthcare Workers West (UHW West) is a large (150,000 member) local union based in Oakland, California. SEIU has some locals larger than some entire members groups of AFL-CIO.
1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East has a membership of 250,000 and claims to be the largest local union in the world.

Andy Stern is current president of SEIU and SEIU is member of "Change to Win", not a member of AFL-CIO.
---------------------------------------------------------
My understanding: SEIU has some structures with employers as does the steelworkers and steel companies (Alliance for American Manufacturing for instance).

With talks of the AFL-CIO and Change to Win reunification, do not look for a battle over healthcare reform within the union in a public light. Even within the Steelworkers, some side with HR676 and others towards traditional company benefits and or VEBA.

Director Douglas Elmendorf of the Congressional Budget Office may or may not be an ally when the CBO gets around to the cost comparisions of varied healthcare proposals. It will be interesting to see if he even includes HR676 in analysis for HR676 is not on the table of healthcare reform Obama style.

Monday, May 4, 2009

Soar 11-3 current local bylaws




It might be necessary to add a bit to these bylaws in the near future. The process to amend and add will be discussed sometimes this summer. NOTE: All bylaw changes must be oked by USW (Soar)

-------------------copied from another Soar site we maintain:


local soar bylaws 11-3
We also will submit to the international the following local bylaws for the Soar group: Note, these are not valid until ratified by International.Bylaws were oked by International (2-07 addition)proposed bylaws for our group Soar 11-3, St. Louis chapter of Soar.NOTE; NO LONGER PROPOSED. INTERNATIONAL HAS OKED AS WRITTEN; JUNE, 2006


PreambleWe believe that the welfare of our members is paramount and our organization is dedicated to the advancement of their intrests and the working man's intrests.Our aim will be to promote and protect the interest of the membership, to elevate the moral, intellectual, political and social conditions of all retired men and women, to assist each other in sickness and distress. Although retired, social and political events have endangered our rights and benefits as retired working persons and our families.-----


ARTICLE ONE - Terms of Officea) terms and conditions of office are specified in SOAR manual.b) Eligibility for Elected OfficeSection 1. All other candidates standing for elected office of the Local Union must be members and have been in continuous good standing for ninety (90) days prior to accepting nomination. The requirement for continuous good standing will be effective . This includes members of SOAR 11-3, PACE and Alliance for Retired Americans whom are in the SOAR 11-3 group.Section 2. No member may run for or hold more than one elected office simultaneously, with the exception of chairs of standing committees. The President shall be member of all committees.Section 3. For usage "proof" of good standing, sign in sheets provided at the meetings shall constitute proof as well as paid membership in SOAR 11-3.-----------


Article TWO- RecallSection 1. A SOAR 11-3 officer, against whom charges have been filed, in accordance with the procedure established by of the International Constitution, may be suspended from office pending the outcome of the trial, by a two-thirds (2/3) vote at a membership meeting--------


Article Three - GeneralSection 1. All Local Union officers (Soar 11-3), committees and other members handling funds or other property of the Union shall at the completion of their duties, turn over all papers, documents, funds, and/or other union property to the properly constituted Local Union officers.-------------------------------


Article Four- Death of member/Next of Kin of memberSection 1. A bible will be provided to the surviror of the next of kin in the event of the death of a current SOAR 11-3 member or their immediate next of kin residing with the member.--------------------------


Article Five - Emergency FundSection one a) A minimum of $5.00 ($5) per member shall be kept in the local emergency fund.b) Monies paid out of the emergency fund shall be paid only to or on behalf of SOAR membersc) A Notice of Motion shall be posted for 7 (seven) days in all units before a vote on any withdrawal of more than $ 300 ( 300 dollars) from the emergency fund.d) the president can authorize expenditures of less than $100 (100) dollars for expenses one his own authority for SOAR meeting expenditures and emergencies upon consulation with the executive board. Between membership meetings or membership votes, the Executive Board shall be the highest authority of the Local and shall exercise general administrative authority and shall be empowered to act on behalf of the membership to the extent urgent business requires prompt and decisive action, subject to subsequent membership approval, but the Executive Board may not take action affecting the vital interests of the Local Union without prior membership approval--------------------------------------------


Article Six - By-Law ChangesSection 1 a) Local union by-laws may be amended by two-thirds (2/3) majority vote at any meeting providing that Notice of Motion giving details of the amendment has been posted at least sixty (60) days prior to the vote, admendment changes can be proposed at a local level in writing to the president of the local chapter of SOAR for submission at next meeting (s). Posting shall be done on Soar website in event of such submission.b) All provisions of all chartered local union by-laws not contained herein shall be of no effect until approved in writing by the national executive board nor shall they conflict with federal, state or local laws.c) The national constitution shall take precedence over these by-laws.--------------------------


Article Seven- Additional duty of TreasurerSection 1) The treasurer will, upon request of the individual Soar 11-3 member or spouse submit due payments to the international. Appropriate records shall be kept of such transaction.----------------with elections next month and with our accepting nominations at the breakfasts across the state, keep in mind that only members in good standing can run for office and only "due" paying members in good standing can vote. If you owe, please submit to SOAR payment.


-----------------------------

international soar bylaws are on our yahoo site

Friday, May 1, 2009

Kay Tillow nurses organization--promoter of HR676

Afternoon.

One of the most vocal supporter of HR676 is Kay Tillow. http://www.healthcare-now.org/

She, as does we; believe Healthcare is a human right.


http://unionsforsinglepayerHR676.org

All Unions Committee For Single Payer Health Care--HR 676 c/o Nurses Professional Organization (NPO) 1169 Eastern Parkway, Suite 2218 Louisville, KY 40217 Tel: (502) 636-1551


---------------------------------

United Steelworkers union Vice President Fred Redmond at HR 676 press conference

Our friend, Fred Redmond, made these HR676 remarks. One shoud take a monent to review his statement: USW leaders onboard with single payer programs---HR676. Fred made these remarks in November, 2008.








addenda to monthly meeting





I did forget one item. Soar is still a major supporter of the HR676 bill. Ralph will go over with group some additional information from the International, including correspondance with USW's Jim Centner. Jim a good man and good supporter of working rights. Right now, folks with international all tied up with salvage of Employee Free Choice Act.


As some of you know, some of our allies have "flipped" on their support of single payer healthcare for the nation. Some were never onboard in the first place. Ditto that of the Employee Free Choice Act (another item we have no intention of compromise)


I did announce at HealthCare Now meeting, our Soar group supports single payer healthcare and will not compromise that position. We will actively use whatever political tactics to make that voice heard, since single payer folks were "excluded" from the national debate in the Obama Healthcare summits.

May meeting

Morning folks:

I will not be in attendance of the May meeting, but the agenda will stay pretty much the same.

Vid of eastside demonstrations will be shown as will a couple other items time permitting. Picnic committee should be formed. Politics: 100 days review and review on status of some Fed/state bills, proposals and law.

April was busy month for the group doing politics. Ralph will give brief report to group and I will privately go over with political action folks some items outside the meeting

Also, the $250 check for most will be reviewed (I do not get one, age discrimination I guess).

Employee Free Choice Act. Is it dead?

Morning Folks

One of the issues that we believe should be the law is the Employee Free Choice Act, the right of folks to form unions or not; as the workers wish and not the company. We have supported this for some time and worked towards getting it passed.

Slam dunk said some of the politicans running for election last cycle. However, not so as of yet and some are proclaiming the act dead in its tracks.

This is interesting story from Wall Street Journal reproduced here for comment by the group. This is one of the May agenda items:

------------------------------------------------------
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124035645604940949.html

APRIL 22, 2009 Card Check Is Dead
Some Democrats only care about labor's money.
By THOMAS FRANK
Article

It has been three hard months of political exile for those on the right, a time
for them to count their grievances and dress their outrage in the trappings of
centuries past. Some have donned colonial outfits to stage tea parties. Others
have found the 1860s more to their taste, reviving the fiery language of
secession fever.

But they can all take heart from one development in the nation's capital. Good
old K Street, where the big tea party never stopped, has all but halted
organized labor's effort to make it easier for workers to unionize.

After massive lobbying both by labor and by business, it appears that the
Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), which, as it now stands, would allow workers to
organize in many cases merely by signing cards instead of holding elections,
will not have the 60 votes required to get past a Republican filibuster in the
Senate.

Now, to be pro-labor is to resign yourself to years of failures and defeats,
with few tea parties along the way for consolation. Even so, the setback on EFCA
has to be a bitter one. Union members worked hard to elect Barack Obama and the
Democratic Congress, as they did to put Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton in the
White House. And now, just as in those previous two periods of Democratic
governance, labor's friends are having trouble enacting basic labor-law reforms.

To understand why we need new rules governing unionization, look no further than
yesterday's New York Times, where Steven Greenhouse told the story of a
Louisville, Ky., hospital whose nurses tried to form a union but failed after
they were reportedly threatened with losing their benefits among other things.

Such practices are commonplace and well-documented by Human Rights Watch and
others. But labor's case never seemed to hit home. Instead, conservatives have
carried the day, playing on lurid stereotypes to hint that intimidation by
unions is the real worry and that EFCA spells the end of secret ballots in the
workplace and hence of democracy itself.

Before I go on, I should acknowledge that this whole thing might be a clever bit
of jiu-jitsu by the unions. After all, the mere threat of EFCA has turned
business almost Soviet in its feigned concern for the proletariat. The Chamber
of Commerce is now exhorting the public to "stand up for workers' rights,"
running a "workforce freedom airlift," and, along with other trade associations,
supporting groups with names like "Coalition for a Democratic Workplace" and
"Workforce Fairness Institute."

EFCA's supporters may simply drop their bill's most controversial provisions,
get some compromise measure passed, and spend the next 20 years reminding
corporate America of the days when it was touchingly committed to "workers'
rights" and a "democratic workplace."

If only. The sole clever reversal we have seen so far has been the familiar one
where Democrats torpedo the most trustworthy member of their coalition.

Why does labor always get it in the neck?

First, there are those Democrats who don't care much for labor to begin with.
Then there is the wide spectrum of Democratic donors and supporters who simply
don't understand the problems of blue-collar life. They might dislike the
religious right, but they didn't give money to Democratic political campaigns to
increase union membership.

Or maybe it's just the money. Consider the lineup of lobbyists that retail giant
Wal-Mart has assembled to make its case against EFCA. According to lobbying
disclosure forms filed with the House and Senate we find that Wal-Mart's
lobbyists include Mehlman Vogel Castagnetti (which employs former presidential
candidate John Kerry's liaison to Congress during the 2004 campaign), a former
legislative director for Rahm Emanuel, and a former assistant to Arkansas
Democratic Sen. Blanche Lincoln.

Wal-Mart has also secured, according lobbying disclosure forms filed with
Congress, the services of Tony Podesta, of the Podesta Group, one of the hottest
lobby shops in Democratic D.C. Mr. Podesta is joined in pushing Wal-Mart's views
on EFCA by a former assistant to Democrat Mark Pryor, the other senator from
Arkansas.

The real standout on Wal-Mart's labor-issues roster, though, is D+P Creative
Strategies, which wears its liberalism as proudly as last week's tax protestors
did their three-cornered hats. According to its Web site, D+P "highlights
partnership, shared benefits, and a commitment to advancing social justice
goals." The disclosure form for its Wal-Mart EFCA activities lists a former
assistant to Labor Secretary Hilda Solis. The bio of its principal, Ingrid
Duran, who is also listed as a Wal-Mart lobbyist, declares that the firm's
mission is "to increase the role of corporate, legislative and philanthropic
efforts in addressing the concerns of Latinos, women, and gay, lesbian, bisexual
and transgender (GLBT) communities."

Maybe the day will come when those communities are correctly addressed by
corporations and the rest. But when their "concerns" turn in the direction of
bargaining with their employers, they're on their own.

Write to thomas@wsj.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the act is dead, coupled with the assult on the UAW; not a banner 100 days for labor. Take that some of our allies have flipped on the single payer health care issue, not a good 100 days. Take that Chrysler will be Fiat, more American stuff oversea adventure, not a good 100 days.
That the steelmills on the eastside are still closed and not producing steel for rebuilding the infrastructure of the land, not a good 100 days for labor.

Perhaps labor should "rethink" support for administration and the democratic party in general in the upcoming elections? Dems, take notice: most elections in Missouri are won or lost with less than 25,000 votes. If labor (or even the retiree labor folks) start switching support from say the dems to green, republicans will win and win big for Missouri next election.